Discussion
The daily concentrations of ambient air pollutants related to five air quality criteria including SO2, NO2, CO, O3, and PM10 recorded from two air pollution monitoring stations were obtained from the Environment Agency. Then, the monthly mean level of each pollutant was calculated.
Based on the results, the air quality of Yazd city during 2017-2020 was generally at a moderate level and the AQI was below 100, but the AQI of Yazd city was unhealthy for sensitive groups in January 2017 and October 2019 and was very unhealthy in March and February 2017. PM10 had the highest concentration of pollutants in the air. The concentration of PM10 in most of the urban areas in Yazd was above the limit of 50 µg/m³ (24-h average), which can be due to desert dust storms. Yazd is often affected by the atmospheric transport of desert dust from drylands around the city. It represents a real threat to air quality and population health in source areas, and its implications extend to downstream areas. Barnaba et al. evaluated the effect of desert dust on particulate matter AQI in Italy. They found that in Italy, desert dust contributes to exceeding PM10 limit fixed by the EU and WHO 25. In addition to the contribution of natural resources, the industrial nature of Yazd city and transfer traffic also have a significant role in shaping air pollution, especially particles. Although economic development has been achieved at the expense of the environment over the past decades, many rigorous environmental policies have been adopted by relevant organizations in the field of reducing air pollution, while progress still needs to be made on cutting back greenhouse gas emissions.
In the present study, according to the available data, 2113 singleton live births, 193 premature births, and 237 spontaneous abortions were considered in the analyses. Evaluating the impact of exposure to different chemical pollutants on human health is a big challenge. The lack of measured data and appropriate methodological approaches remain two main obstacles. In this study, the effect of air pollutant on birth and pregnancy consequences was investigated and ARMA model was used for data analysis.
Based on data analysis, there was a significant relationship between the ratio of a girl born with total birth with the mean concentration of NO2 and AQI, while no relationship was observed with other air pollutants. Although the number of studies conducted in the field of the relationship between infant gender and exposure to environmental pollutants is very limited, previous research on environmental pollutants suggested that fluctuations in sex ratios of births might provide a useful early warning of possible health effects of toxins or other environmental stressors. According to the analyses of the sex ratios of Williams et al. 26, a study in residential areas at risk of airborne pollution from incinerators showed locations with statistically significant excesses of female births. In a small industrial town in central Scotland, the possible role of air pollution was associated with an abnormally high sex ratio of births 27. Research in populations and wildlife has shown a fewer male births, but the mechanism by which environmental risks may change the gender relationship remains unclear 28.
Based on the result of this study, exposure to CO, SO2, O3, and PM10 throughout pregnancy was not associated with preterm delivery (birth before 37 weeks of gestation). However, increased risk for premature delivery, significantly related to AQI and NO2 concentration during the pregnancy. The evidence for the association between PTB and air pollutants is conflicting. The findings of several studies showed that the increased risk of PTB is consistent with exposure to air pollution during pregnancy 29-31, while it was not observed in some other studies.
The time series study of the relationship between LBW at birth with exposure to CO, NO2, O3, and PM10 as well as AQI index during pregnancy demonstrated that there was no relationship between air pollution and AQI index with a birth weight loss. In many studies, inhalation of air pollutants during pregnancy was associated with LBW 32, 33. The results of Chen et al. showed that exposure to PM2.5, PM10, NO2, SO2, and CO before and during pregnancy was strongly implicated with an increased risk of LBW 34. In the study by Bergstra et al., the higher exposure to PM10, NOX, SO2, and VOC during pregnancy was significantly associated with lower birth weight 35. Gray et al. predicted concentrations of PM2.5 and O3 pollutants which were associated with a greater effect on LBW and increase in LBW risk 36. Researchers have hypothesized that exposure to particles may directly modulate trophoblast proliferation, due to the interaction between these pollutants and placental growth factor receptors 37, 38. Such reactions may interfere with placental fetal oxygen and nutrient exchange and subsequently disrupt the growth of the fetus 19. However, some surveys were similar to the findings of the present work 39, 40. A study also showed that there was a relationship between O3 and LBW 19. Currently, more research is required to gain a better understanding of the effects of air pollution on LBW, including the identification of susceptible populations, the effects of multiple pollutants, the influence of different climate types, time symmetries, and different study designs.
The results of investigating the relationship between height and head circumference of newborns with air pollutants in pregnancy showed that there was no relationship between exposure to CO, NO2, O3, and PM10 as well as AQI during pregnancy with height and head circumference of the newborn. Similar studies have been conducted to investigate the relationship between the height and head circumference of infants and exposure to environmental and indoor air pollutants. In the cross-sectional analysis of Hooven et al., PM10 and NO2 amounts were both associated with a smaller fetal head circumference in the third trimester of pregnancy, but mean levels of PM10 and NO2 during pregnancy were not associated with newborn head circumference and length 10. The results of a similar study by Franklin et al. showed that exposure to NO2 had no significant relationship with height and head circumference of newborns 41, which is consistent with the results of the present study.
The effects of environmental pollution on fetal spontaneous abortion are still unclear. Spontaneous abortion records were collected from Yazd mother and child cohort study (237 abortions) and their relationship with exposure levels to CO, NO2, O3, and PM10 as well as AQI was studied between 2017 and March 2020. The results showed that there was a significant relationship between O3 pollutants and spontaneous abortion. Many studies have examined the relationship between air pollutants and the risk of spontaneous abortion, with considerable heterogeneity among the results. The degree of heterogeneity varied significantly depending on the pollutant, consequences, and duration of exposure. A time series study in Italy reported that with an increase in exposure to 10 µg/m3 PM10 and ozone, the risk of spontaneous abortion increased by 20% and 34%, respectively 42. A case-control study failed to confirm an association with PM10, but showed that exposure to total suspended particulate (TSP) in the first 14 weeks of pregnancy during the heating period (December to May) doubled the risk of spontaneous abortion (OR = 2.04, 95 % CI 1.01–4.13) 43. A case-control study in Iran showed that CO, NO2, O3, and PM10 had a strong effect on spontaneous abortion, but no association was found between SO2 and spontaneous abortion 44. However, a time-series study in Ahvaz reported no association between spontaneous abortion and CO exposure 45, and a Kuhurt study found null results 46. A study in Croatia showed that the frequency of abortion was lower when the local coal plant was closed (P-value < 0.05) 47. However, some other studies failed to support the above findings 42, 45, 46. Studies showed inconclusive results; therefore, more studies have to be conducted in this field.
Lack of a relationship between air pollutants and pregnancy consequences in present study may be due to low levels of those pollutants, limitations of individual exposure assessment, or lack of association. Lomelin et al. reported that assessing the relationship between adverse birth outcomes with air pollution is complex. Integrating spatial data mining, epidemiology, and geography can accelerate future research on the association between air pollutant mixtures and adverse birth outcomes 48. Guo et al. debated on the relationship between air pollution and adverse birth outcomes that may be relatively stable. However, relations can be affected by key factors of importance. It is recognized as the toxicity and effects of pollutants that may vary geographically. A significant effect of exposure to NO2 or PM10 was observed only for non-Asian studies, which may be due to the fact that fewer studies were conducted in Asian countries 49. It suggests that more studies are required to be conducted, especially in developing countries that generally have higher environmental pollution. Lavigne et al. findings suggest that intercity differences in glutathione (GSH) oxidative potential related to PM2.5 may modify the association between exposure to ambient PM2.5 mass concentrations during pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes 50.
The results of the study and review of similar studies showed that the exact mechanism(s) that link ambient air pollution and adverse birth outcomes could not be clearly defined. Evidence suggests that oxidative stress may have an important effect. The effects of oxidative stress on enzymatic antioxidants may contribute to adverse birth outcomes such as infertility, miscarriage, preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, and preterm delivery 51.
Strengths and limitations
In this study, the relationship between adverse birth outcomes and five air pollutants (CO, NO2, O3, SO2, and PM10) and the AQI in Yazd city was reported. The study was conducted as a time series and data analysis was done using ARMA model to identify possible exposure relationships.
This study also had several limitations. The researchers could not conclude the relationship based on individual exposure to air pollutants. Some uncontrollable factors, such as economic status, medical history, job, and place of residence may effect on person’s level of exposure to air pollutants. Prospective studies may benefit from a prospective cohort research design that allows researchers to use biomarkers and if possible, use a collection of detailed information about the characteristics of people being studied. The second limitation is that the residential address is unique to the address at the time of birth. However, many women may have lived in other cities during pregnancy. Therefore, the researchers were unable to adjust their analysis for mothers’ residential mobility during pregnancy.
Also, it could be said that to compare and combine the estimation of air pollutants, the results were scaled according to the concentration ratios of different averaging times, which only reflected the scale differences, not the actual difference related to the peak and average exposure.
Conclusions
In this study, the effect of exposure to various air pollutants on the adverse outcomes of birth and pregnancy was investigated, using ARMA model. A total of 2131 singleton live births, 193 premature births, and 237 spontaneous abortions were studied. The results showed that an increase in NO2 concentration and AQI were associated with an increase in the ratio of a girl born to total births (Coef:7.943, 95%CI:2.797,13.089 and Coef:0.001, 95%CI:0.000,0.001, respectively) and the risk of premature birth (Coef:2.915, 95%CI:0.224, 5.606 and Coef:0.001, 95%CI:0.000,0.001, respectively).,There was also a significant relationship between the mean concentration of NO2 (Coef: 44.751, 95%CI: 26.872, 62.629) and O3 (Coef: -4.124, 95%CI: -8.031, -0.218) pollutants in the air with spontaneous abortion. The results of the present study cannot show a definitive relationship between air pollution and other adverse birth outcomes. The lack of association between air pollutants and pregnancy outcomes in present study may be due to low levels of pollutants, limitations of individual exposure assessment, or lack of association. Therefore, more studies are required to be conducted.
Acknowledgment
Authors would like to thank Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences for supporting the current research.
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This project is funded by Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences (ID: 7102).
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
This is an Open-Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon this work for commercial use.
References
1. Clemens T, Turner S, Dibben C. Maternal exposure to ambient air pollution and fetal growth in North-East Scotland: A population-based study using routine ultrasound scans. Environ Int. 2017;107:216-26.
2. Filippini M, Masiero G, Steinbach S. The impact of ambient air pollution on hospital admissions. Eur J Health Econ. 2019;20(6):919-31.
3. Holgate ST. ‘Every breath we take: the lifelong impact of air pollution’–a call for action. Clin Med. 2017;17(1):8.
4. Ammons S. Using the Index of Concentration at the Extremes to Examine the Impact of Air Pollution Exposure on Infant Mortality in the United States: University of Maryland, College Park; 2019.
5. Sowlat MH, Gharibi H, Yunesian M, et al. A novel, fuzzy-based air quality index (FAQI) for air quality assessment. Atmos Environ. 2011;45(12): 2050-9.
6. Sicard P, Lesne O, Alexandre N, et al. Air quality trends and potential health effects–development of an aggregate risk index. Atmos Environ. 2011; 45(5):1145-53.
7. Pirdehghan A, Vakili M, Dehghan R, et al. High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and adverse pregnancy outcomes in Yazd, a central province of Iran. J Reprod Infert. 2016;17(1):34.
8. Arroyo V, Díaz J, Salvador P, Linares C. Impact of air pollution on low birth weight in Spain: an approach to a National Level Study. Environ Res. 2019;171:69-79.
9. Li S, Wang H, Hu H, et al. Effect of ambient air pollution on premature SGA in Changzhou city, 2013–2016: a retrospective study. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1-10.
10. Van den Hooven EH, Pierik FH, de Kluizenaar Y, et al. Air pollution exposure during pregnancy, ultrasound measures of fetal growth, and adverse birth outcomes: a prospective cohort study. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120(1):150-6.
11. Nielsen CC, Amrhein CG, Osornio-Vargas AR. Geographical analysis of the distribution of publications describing spatial associations among outdoor environmental variables and really small newborns in the USA and Canada. Challenges. 2019;10(1):11.
12. Šrám RJ, Binková B, Dejmek J, Bobak M. Ambient air pollution and pregnancy outcomes: a review of the literature. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113(4):375-82.
13. Xiong L, Xu Z, Tan J, et al. Acute effects of air pollutants on adverse birth outcomes in Changsha, China: a population data with time-series analysis from 2015 to 2017. Medicine. 2019;98(3).
14. Sun S, Spangler KR, Weinberger KR, et al. Ambient temperature and markers of fetal growth: a retrospective observational study of 29 million US singleton births. Environ Health Perspect. 2019;127(6):067005.
15. Morello-Frosch R, Jesdale BM, Sadd JL, Pastor M. Ambient air pollution exposure and full-term birth weight in California. Environ Health. 2010; 9(1):1-13.
16. Qian Z, Liang S, Yang S, et al. Ambient air pollution and preterm birth: a prospective birth cohort study in Wuhan, China. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2016;219(2):195-203.
17. Romero R, Conde-Agudelo A, Da Fonseca E, et al. Vaginal progesterone for preventing preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcomes in singleton gestations with a short cervix: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(2):161-80.
18. Stieb DM, Lavigne E, Chen L, et al. Air pollution in the week prior to delivery and preterm birth in 24 Canadian cities: a time to event analysis. Environ Health. 2019;18:1-11.
19. Ha S, Hu H, Roussos-Ross D, et al. The effects of air pollution on adverse birth outcomes. Environ Res. 2014;134:198-204.
20. Bodnar LM, Platt RW, Simhan HN. Early-pregnancy vitamin D deficiency and risk of preterm birth subtypes. Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 125(2):439.
21. Mansour O, Hernandez‐Diaz S, Wyszynski DF. mRNA COVID‐19 Vaccination Early in Pregnancy and the Risk of Spontaneous Abortion in an International Pregnancy Registry. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2022.
22. Kumar A, Goyal P. Forecasting of daily air quality index in Delhi. Sci Total Environ. 2011; 409(24):5517-23.
23. Chen S, Lan X, Hu Y, et al. The time series forecasting: from the aspect of network. arXiv preprint arXiv:14031713. 2014.
24. Devi BU, Sundar D, Alli P. An effective time series analysis for stock trend prediction using ARIMA model for nifty midcap-50. Int J Data Mining & Knowledge Manag Process. 2013;3(1): 65.
25. Barnaba F, Alvan Romero N, Bolignano A, et al. Multiannual assessment of the desert dust impact on air quality in Italy combining PM10 data with physics-based and geostatistical models. Environ Int. 2022;163:107204.
26. Williams F, Lawson A, Lloyd O. Low sex ratios of births in areas at risk from air pollution from incinerators, as shown by geographical analysis and 3-dimensional mapping. Int J Epid. 1992;21(2):311-9.
27. Lloyd OL, Lloyd M, Holland Y, Lyster W. An unusual sex ratio of births in an industrial town with mortality problems. BJOG: Obstet Gynecol Int J. 1984;91(9):901-7.
28. Terrell ML, Hartnett KP, Marcus M. Can environmental or occupational hazards alter the sex ratio at birth? A systematic review. Emerg Health Threats J. 2011;4(1):7109.
29. Stieb DM, Chen L, Eshoul M, Judek S. Ambient air pollution, birth weight and preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Res. 2012;117:100-11.
30. Sun X, Luo X, Zhao C, et al. The association between fine particulate matter exposure during pregnancy and preterm birth: a meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(1):1-12.
31. Zhu X, Liu Y, Chen Y, et al. Maternal exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2. 5) and pregnancy outcomes: a meta-analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2015;22(5):3383-96.
32. Laurent O, Hu J, Li L, et al. Low birth weight and air pollution in California: Which sources and components drive the risk? Environ Int. 2016;92-93:471-7.
33. Lavigne E, Gasparrini A, Stieb DM, et al. Maternal Exposure to Aeroallergens and the Risk of Early Delivery. Epidemiology. 2017;28(1).
34. Chen J, Fang J, Zhang Y, et al. Associations of adverse pregnancy outcomes with high ambient air pollution exposure: Results from the Project ELEFANT. Sci Total Environ. 2021;761:143218.
35. Bergstra AD, Brunekreef B, Burdorf A. The influence of industry-related air pollution on birth outcomes in an industrialized area. Environ Pollut. 2021;269:115741.
36. Gray SC, Edwards SE, Schultz BD, Miranda ML. Assessing the impact of race, social factors and air pollution on birth outcomes: a population-based study. Environ Health. 2014;13(1):1-8.
37. Dejmek J, Solanský I, Benes I, et al. The impact of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and fine particles on pregnancy outcome. Environ Health Perspect. 2000;108(12):1159-64.
38. Perera FP, Whyatt RM, Jedrychowski W, et al. Recent developments in molecular epidemiology: a study of the effects of environmental polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on birth outcomes in Poland. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;147(3):309-14.
39. Wilhelm M, Ghosh JK, Su J, et al. Traffic-related air toxics and term low birth weight in Los Angeles County, California. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120(1):132-8.
40. Liu S, Krewski D, Shi Y, et al. Association between gaseous ambient air pollutants and adverse pregnancy outcomes in Vancouver, Canada. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111(14): 1773-8.
41. Franklin P, Tan M, Hemy N, Hall GL. Maternal exposure to indoor air pollution and birth outcomes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(8):1364.
42. Di Ciaula A, Bilancia M. Relationships between mild PM10 and ozone urban air levels and spontaneous abortion: clues for primary prevention. Int J Environ Health Res. 2015;25(6): 640-55.
43. Hou HY, Wang D, Zou XP, et al. Does ambient air pollutants increase the risk of fetal loss? A case–control study. Arch Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;289(2):285-91.
44. Moridi M, Ziaei S, Kazemnejad A. Exposure to ambient air pollutants and spontaneous abortion. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014;40(3):743-8.
45. Dastoorpoor M, Idani E, Goudarzi G, Khanjani N. Acute effects of air pollution on spontaneous abortion, premature delivery, and stillbirth in Ahvaz, Iran: a time-series study. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2018;25(6):5447-58.
46. Ha S, Sundaram R, Louis GMB, et al. Ambient air pollution and the risk of pregnancy loss: a prospective cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2018; 109(1):148-53.
47. Mohorovic L, Petrovic O, Haller H, Micovic V. Pregnancy loss and maternal methemoglobin levels: an indirect explanation of the association of environmental toxics and their adverse effects on the mother and the fetus. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010;7(12):4203-12.
48. Serrano-Lomelin J, Nielsen CC, Jabbar MSM, et al. Interdisciplinary-driven hypotheses on spatial associations of mixtures of industrial air pollutants with adverse birth outcomes. Environ Int. 2019; 131:104972.
49. Guo LQ, Chen Y, Mi BB, Dang SN, Zhao DD, Liu R, et al. Ambient air pollution and adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2019;20(3):238-52.
50. Lavigne E, Burnett RT, Stieb DM, et al. Fine particulate air pollution and adverse birth outcomes: effect modification by regional nonvolatile oxidative potential. Environ Health Perspect. 2018;126(07):077012.
51. Duhig K, Chappell LC, Shennan AH. Oxidative stress in pregnancy and reproduction. Obstet Med. 2016;9(3):113-6.