Volume 7, Issue 4 (December 2022)                   J Environ Health Sustain Dev 2022, 7(4): 1827-1841 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Solanki R, Pathak K. Aerosol Optical Depth Spatial and Temporal Variability Using Satellite Data Over Indian Major Cities. J Environ Health Sustain Dev 2022; 7 (4) :1827-1841
URL: http://jehsd.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-526-en.html
Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology, Surat -395 007.
Full-Text [PDF 1716 kb]   (189 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (361 Views)
Full-Text:   (170 Views)
Aerosol Optical Depth Spatial and Temporal Variability Using Satellite Data Over Indian Major Cities

Ranjitkumar Solanki 1*, Kamlesh Pathak 1

1 Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology, Surat -395 007.
A R T I C L E  I N F O ABSTRACT
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Introduction: The study’s main aim is to investigate the long-term variation of Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD). It also aims to show the relationship between meteorological parameters. This study evaluates long-term (2010 to 2021) special and temporal changes over major Indian regions using satellite-based data from NASA’s Terra Satellite.
Materials and Methods: This study was carried out during 2010-2021 using MODIS data for long-term analysis. Variation of AOD with meteorological parameters was also performed to show the impact of these parameters (Temperature and Relative Humidity) on AOD by the MERRA-II model.
Results: Based on Terra AOD data, in all the studied regions, especially the eastern region (Kolkata), the mean AOD was high (0.9-1.2). In the western region (Mumbai, Ahmedabad, and Surat), the mean AOD was low to moderate during all seasons. Furthermore, the impact of meteorological parameters on AOD shows significant variation in average annual AOD in Kolkata (0.70 ± 0.09), while other regions reported lower than average AOD values during the study period. Mumbai and Surat had average AODs (0.44 ± 0.13), (0.45 ± 0.14), while Ahmedabad and Jaipur reported average AOD of 0.45 ± 0.14 and 0.23 ± 0.11 during the study period, respectively.
Conclusion: Generally, AOD values vary from season to season due to aerosol’s optical and microphysical properties being affected by meteorological conditions and surface albedo. This study examined the spatial and temporal distribution of AOD over five major Indian cities.

Article History:
Received: 13 August 2022
Accepted: 20 October 2022

*Corresponding Author:
Ranjitkumar Solanki
Email:
ranjit33solanki@gmail.com
Tel:
+91 7984808748

Keywords:
Aerosol Optical Depth,
Atmosphere,
Health,
Meteorology,
Indian Cities.
Citation: Solank R, Pathak K. Aerosol Optical Depth Spatial and Temporal Variability Using Satellite Data Over Indian Major Cities. J Environ Health Sustain Dev. 2022; 7(4): 1827-41.
Introduction
Aerosol concentrations in the atmosphere significantly impact both human health and indeed the earth’s climate 1–4. Researchers have become very interested in the field of atmosphere 5–7. These effects go far beyond global warming, affecting ecosystems and populations all across the globe. Things we rely on and value, such as water, electricity, transportation, wildlife, agriculture, environment, and human health are all affected by climate change. Aerosols in the atmosphere have the ability to affect the climate system by the absorption and reflection of solar energy 8,9. Aerosols can enter the atmosphere from anthropogenic or natural sources, as well as atmospheric chemical and physical processes 10. Natural processes (such as soil dust, desert dust, sea salt, biogenic, and volcanic emissions) and anthropogenic activities (such as fossil fuel combustion, urban and industrial emissions, volatile organic compounds from vegetation, and agricultural waste burning) both contribute to the evolution of aerosol compounds in the atmosphere 11. Aerosols are produced in one spot and then dispersed over vast distances by winds, causing impacts at locations far from the source 12. On regional and global scales, research into aerosol properties is critical. However, aerosol data are spatially limited, and their effects on climate change are largely unknown 13.
Satellite remote sensing offers the benefit of providing spatial and temporal distributions of aerosol optical characteristics in this aspect. Previous studies have been conducted by 14 northeastern Asia (NEA), northern China (NC), southern China (SC), southeastern Asia (SEA), northwestern China (NWC), south Asia (SA), Middle East (ME), western Europe (WEU), Sahara desert (SD), central Africa (CF), eastern United States (EUS), and Amazon zone (AMZ) in the long-term (1980-2016) AOD trend using MISR, Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS) Aqua, and MERRA-2. They have suggested that in all the regions, meteorological factors can change the percentage of AOD variability from 20.4% to 78.2%. In addition, many studies have validated the MODIS products with AERONET (Aerosol Robotic NETwork) AOD over different Indian areas, and MODIS correlation was analyzed  with AERONET over Jaipur city 15. Seasonal means of AOD at 0.4 μm are found to vary from 0.36 (pre-monsoon) to 0.47 (monsoon) and from 0.07 (winter) to 0.17 (pre-monsoon) over Ahmedabad using a sun-photometer 16.
This study focused on long-term (2010-2022) variations of AOD over densely populated major Indian cities. The study aimed to demonstrate the temporal variations, emphasizing five significant Indian cities using the MODIS gridded mean AOD data. Finally, the study analyzed the distribution of AOD with a meteorological parameter, such as temperature (T) and relative humidity (RH), in the studied regions.
Study area
Indian megacities have rapid growth in terms of the economy, population, and industrial activity, causing many anthropogenic events. Five different significant cities were investigated in this study, represented in Figure 1. India is located on the equator's northern side. The area latitude and the longitude is 06.73° N and 35.50° N; respectively, the longitude is 68.11° E and 97.41° E. Most of the areas of Indian country have tropical climates because the tropic of cancer intercepts the country in the middle part. In this study, the daily-averaged AOD product from the MODIS satellite was used for five different Indian stations; Figure 1 and Table 1 show the geographical locations of the study regions, elevation from mean sea level, and population data according to census 2011 (https:// www .census2011.co.in/).


Figure 1: Geographical locations of the study regions (Kolkata, Mumbai, Ahmedabad Surat, and Jaipur)

Table 1: Details of the states, cities, and their locations (latitude, longitude, and elevation)
State City Location Elevation [MSL] Population Population density
West Bengal Kolkata 22.57° N, 88.36° E 9 44,96,694 24306
Maharashtra Mumbai 19.07° N, 72.87° E 11 93,56,962 20980
Rajasthan Jaipur 26.91° N, 75.78° E 390 3,046,163 9,700
Gujarat Surat 21.17° N, 72.83° E 13 6,081,322 10052
Gujarat Ahmedabad 23.02° N, 72.57° E 53 5,633,927 16,000
Note: MSL means Mean Sea Level
Kolkata (22.57° N, 88.36° E) is one of the most populated cities located on the eastern bank of the Hooghly River. It has a tropical wet-dry climate. Mumbai (19.07° N, 72.87° E) is one of the most populated cities and a large seaport area near the Arabian Sea with a tropical climate. Jaipur (26.91° N, 75.78° E) is the capital city of the Indian state of Rajasthan. It is located on the Thar Desert’s eastern boundary, and it has been covered by Aravalli Mountain from the two sides 17,18, which is also one of the most populated cities. It has a hot semi-arid climate with long, sweltering summers and short, mild, to warm winters. Surat (21.17° N, 72.83° E) is one of Gujrat's diamond and textile industrial hubs. It has a tropical savanna-type climate with a large seashore area and is located near the bank of the Tapi River. Out of five different Indian regions, Ahmedabad (23.02° N, 72.57° E) has emerged as one of India's significant economic and industrial hubs. Ahmedabad has a hot semi-arid-type climate.
Materials and Methods
Remote sensing data provide a better understanding of aerosol characteristics at a large scale and are available in a wide range, while ground-based observation is very limited.
MODIS products under go different processing levels including geo-located and calibrated at level 1.0, products derived from geophysical data at level 2.0, and gridded time-averaged products at level 3.0 and collections
19. The data were obtained from NASA's GIOVVANI website (http://giovanni.gsfc.nasa.gov/giovanni/). The MODIS onboard Terra/Aqua satellites measure reflected sunlight from the surface and the Earth's atmosphere, as well as emitted thermal radiation at wavelengths of 36, to give daily global information on Earth's atmospheric aerosol parameters 20. MODIS has a swathe resolution of around 2330 km and circles the Earth 14 to 15 times daily to cover the globe. Two separate techniques are used to retrieve aerosol properties over land and water, and these algorithms are constantly being refined 21,22. MODIS aerosol science team articles contain a detailed description of the MODIS aerosol retrieval algorithms 23,24. MODIS AOD parameter is substantially validated regionally and globally and has been used for aerosol studies 11,25. The predicted errors in obtaining these parameters are less than ± 0.05, and the uncertainties are mostly attributable to the non-spherical size distribution of aerosols and different techniques employed for land and ocean 26. Because of the wide range of data products available, the MODIS satellite products were used for AOD measurement in this study. The devices use spectral observations by reflected solar radiation, radiative transfer calculations, and AOD level calculated by the aerosol models, as shown in Figure 2. Both EOS satellites (Aqua and Terra) of MODIS collect the AOD level two times daily with high spatial resolution on a near-global basis (10 km2) 26. A precise choice of satellite AOD products over a certain location is critical for accurately calculating the aerosol level in that extent 27. Compared to ground-based observations, satellite-based observations make available information over a greater spatial domain 5. Furthermore, satellite-based monitoring allows for the systematic recovery of aerosol optical characteristics at worldwide and regional scales. According to Lee et al. study 28, satellite-based monitoring can be used to supplement ground monitoring stations, particularly in areas with a limited number of monitors. The present study used MODIS Aqua and Terra products to look at AOD loading over Indian regions.

Figure 2: Schematic diagram of MODIS data processing
 The long-term data extracted from 2011 to 2020 were used to analyze the monthly, seasonal, and annual average AOD values. For this study, the daily Level-2 MODIS/Terra (MYD08) Dark Target retrieval technique Collection-6 3-km AOD products were used across the Indian region. The cloud mask and Level 1B calibrated radiances are used to create MODIS atmospheric profiles. These profiles, which are created globally for clear skies only, comprise total column estimates of the tropospheric and stratospheric ozone, temperature and moisture profiles of the atmosphere, indicators of atmospheric stability, and total column amounts of water vapor. Atmospheric products at level 2 give information on aerosol and cloud characteristics. Global optical thickness and size distribution of atmospheric aerosols across land and oceans are included in the MODIS aerosol package. The daily data were used to compute monthly, seasonal, and annual averages over the entire period of the study. For seasonal analysis, we have climatological season divided into four main seasons, including winter or dry season (December to February), pre-monsoon season (March to May), and monsoon or rainy season (June to September), and post-monsoon (October to November). Temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed data were considered meteorological parameters. The temperature and relative humidity data were taken from Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center MERRA-II (https://www.soda-pro.com/web-services/meteo-data/merra).

Results
Analysis of annual mean variations in Aerosol Optical Depths (AOD)
At 550 nm, the annual average AOD obtained from January 2010 to December 2021 (twelve-year data) from the MODIS instrument on the Terra satellite is shown in Figures 3 and 4 and Table 2. AOD concentration significantly increased throughout the study period from the previous year to the recent year. Figures 3 and 4 demonstrate that the western and southern regions show low AOD concentrations annually, while the central Indian region shows moderate AOD concentrations. The Indo-Gangetic Plain (IGP) in North India, in particular, exhibits the highest yearly aerosol loading, which may be related to its northern Himalayas, simple topography, and metrological factors, particularly wind patterns, and the most anthropogenic emissions. Relatively low to moderate variations were observed over the Himalayan region throughout the study period.
Due to an increase in the combustion of biomass and fossil fuels, urbanization, and high population, Kolkata experienced higher AOD values (> 0.7) during the study period compared to other regions except 2020, as shown in Figure 4. Compared to the eastern region of Kolkata, in the Western region of Mumbai, Surat, Ahmedabad, and Jaipur, the mean annual AOD was determined to be moderate, at (0.39 ± 0.12). However, the 2021 western regions, especially Ahmedabad, Surat, and Mumbai, showed a higher AOD concentration (0.86).
Table 2: Average annual variation of AOD with standard deviation during 2011-2021
Years KLK MUM ST AHM JAI
Avg.* Std.** Avg. Std. Avg. Std. Avg. Std. Avg. Std.
2011 0.68 0.15 0.36 0.06 0.34 0.08 0.37 0.17 0.22 0.13
2012 0.65 0.19 0.38 0.07 0.38 0.07 0.44 0.14 0.26 0.10
2013 0.65 0.20 0.38 0.09 0.42 0.12 0.43 0.12 0.21 0.08
2014 0.66 0.21 0.42 0.08 0.46 0.14 0.46 0.14 0.21 0.11
2015 0.80 0.26 0.47 0.16 0.48 0.13 0.48 0.15 0.23 0.10
2016 0.78 0.42 0.36 0.09 0.41 0.09 0.40 0.08 0.26 0.12
2017 0.73 0.18 0.41 0.04 0.47 0.13 0.48 0.15 0.21 0.10
2018 0.79 0.15 0.45 0.09 0.48 0.09 0.47 0.11 0.25 0.10
2019 0.74 0.21 0.45 0.07 0.46 0.12 0.50 0.16 0.26 0.18
2020 0.70 0.23 0.43 0.09 0.44 0.14 0.49 0.22 0.24 0.11
2021 0.83 0.29 0.52 0.09 0.59 0.22 0.50 0.16 0.23 0.13
*Avg: Average
**Std: Standard Deviation

Figure 3: MODIS Terra monthly AOD variations over major Indian cities from 2015 to 2020


Figure 4: MODIS Terra annual AOD variations over major Indian cities
These noticeable rising trends, which are practically ubiquitous throughout India, are equally attributed to either natural or anthropogenic factors or a combined effect.
Analysis of seasonal mean variations in AOD
AOD retrieved from MODIS Terra satellite sensor for spatial variation from 2010 to 2021 over five major Indian regions (as shown in Figure 1 and Table 3 Kolkata, Mumbai, Jaipur, Surat, and Ahmedabad). As depicted in Figure 5, all the selected Indian cities show higher AOD concentrations during the winter and monsoon period (0 to 1.2). Dust activities affected by moisture in the soil, wind speed, rainfall, and monsoon onset result in an increase in AOD in the pre-monsoon season that peaks in the monsoon season 29. Kolkata shows high AOD concentration during (0.7-1.1) winter and monsoon, caused by stable weather and localized burning (stove used for cocking and vehicular emission), whereas mean AOD is 0.6-0.8 in pre-monsoon and post-monsoon. It has been observed that aerosol accumulation increased over IGP (Indo Gangetic Plan) from west to east, which may be related to wind and a stable environment. Jaipur has significant aerosol loading (0.3-0.4) during the pre-monsoon as well as monsoon seasons.
It is probably caused by desert dust, hygroscopic accumulation of aerosol particles, and heavy winds from the southwest, respectively. However, during the post-monsoon period, low AOD values (0.10-0.25) indicate the probability of wet deposition. Due to the blowing of crop residues by northwesterly winds originating across Punjab and Haryana during the post-monsoon, an average AOD value (0.85-0.95) is observed at 30,31. Both coastal regions, Surat and Mumbai, show moderate change during the whole season, except in post-monsoon, which shows slightly higher AOD values than other seasons. Higher AOD value is observed in Ahmedabad during Monsoon and post-monsoon.
Analysis of monthly mean variations in AOD
The AOD also varies significantly from month to month, as depicted in the radar plot in Figure 6 and Table 4. Figure 5 shows AOD variation over selected regions. AOD levels increase from the center to the perimeter, and ring size increases as AOD increases for different cities. The improved cloud screening algorithm of MODIS AOD retrieval procedure 11,32 shows data gaps around the monsoon months (June to September). Surat showed the highest AOD value (0.9) in June 2021, whereas the lowest AOD value (0.2) was observed in May 2020 and in general (0.4). Due to the humid climate of the coastal city of Surat AOD of this city was lower than other regions. The mean AOD concentration in Mumbai was the minimum (0.1), while the maximum (0.88) was found during September and November, respectively. The relatively lowest mean AOD over Kolkata was found to be 0.1 during August, while the highest AOD found to be 1.6 during February. The mean AOD concentration in Ahmedabad was found to be a minimum (0.2) during most of the months, while the maximum value was found during July (1.0). In Jaipur, the AOD value was the minimum (0.1-.02) throughout the year while the maximum (0.8) was observed during November. The dust aerosol particles are the primary reason for the variability in Jaipur 17.



Figure 5: Spatial AOD distribution for seasonal MODIS Terra over major Indian cities
Table 3: Seasonal average and STD
Months KLK MUM ST AHM JAI
Avg. Std. Avg. Std. Avg. Std. Avg. Std. Avg. Std.
Winter 0.84 0.26 0.43 0.10 0.45 0.13 0.43 0.13 0.24 0.09
Pre-monsoon 0.72 0.21 0.39 0.06 0.36 0.07 0.36 0.06 0.21 0.07
Monsoon 0.71 0.25 0.41 0.15 0.56 0.17 0.60 0.17 0.22 0.12
Post-monsson 0.59 0.14 0.46 0.12 0.51 0.10 0.50 0.10 0.30 0.17
*Avg: Average
**Std: Standard Deviation


Figure 6: AOD product derived from MODIS Terra over the Indian regions (Kolkata, Mumbai, Ahmedabad, Surat, and Jaipur) during 2010-2021

Table 4: Monthly trend in the study cities
Months KLK MUM ST AHM JAI
Jan 0.90 0.41 0.46 0.43 0.27
Feb 0.77 0.48 0.42 0.37 0.20
Mar 0.87 0.35 0.40 0.37 0.15
Apr 0.71 0.40 0.38 0.38 0.20
May 0.60 0.42 0.29 0.31 0.26
Jun 0.86 0.37 0.54 0.60 0.29
Jul ND ND ND 0.78 0.29
Aug 0.19 ND ND 0.72 0.16
Sep 0.58 0.49 0.58 0.58 0.13
Oct 0.57 0.48 0.47 0.45 0.18
Nov 0.62 0.43 0.54 0.55 0.41
Dec 0.84 0.39 0.46 0.48 0.25
Higher values in these months showed the cloud contamination in observed MODIS AOD values. Figure 6 shows the variation of MODIS Terra monthly mean values in Kolkata, Mumbai, Ahmedabad, Surat, and Jaipur. The improved cloud screening algorithm of MODIS AOD retrieval procedure 11,32 shows data gaps around the monsoon months (June to September). Lower AOD values were mostly observed in May for all the years and locations (Kolkata, Mumbai, Surat, Jaipur, and Ahmedabad). An overall decreasing annual tendency was observed in Surat and Ahmedabad, whereas increasing trends were observed in Kolkata and Mumbai. The variability peaks were observed from May to June. The data from July to August were not considered due to considerable uncertainty during these periods.
During the study period, we observed that Kolkata showed the mean AOD value 0.8 ± 0.2, except for December 2015 and January 2016, 2017, 2019, and 2020 which showed uncertainty (Figure 6). Mumbai also showed a mean value of 0.6 ± 0.2, except for October 2020. The mean AOD value was 0.6 ± 0.3, except for September 2017. Jaipur showed a mean value of 0.4 ± 0.2, except for November. Ahmedabad also showed a mean value of 0.4 ± 0.2 throughout the year except in July 2019, as shown in Figure 6.

Trends in AOD at four locations

AOD tendencies were calculated by taking the difference of annual average AOD for twelve years (January 2011 to December 2021) depicted in Figure 7 in five locations (Kolkata, Mumbai, Surat, Jaipur, and Ahmedabad). It is found that overall decreasing linear tendencies and trends were found in all periods. Kolkata showed higher annual average AOD values (0.72 ± 0.23), while Jaipur showed lower annual average AOD (0.23 ± 0.11). The mean AOD values in Mumbai, Surat, and Ahmedabad were 0.41 ± 0.09, 0.44 ± 0.13, and 0.39 ± 0.14, respectively, indicating moderate AOD values during the study period.  MODIS Terra sensors could be due to decreasing anthropogenic activities depending on the population and area of the location.


Figure 7: Line plot for Terra mean cumulative AOD trends during twelve years (January 2010 to December 2021) in Jaipur (JAI), Mumbai (MUM), Kolkata (KLK), Surat (ST), and Ahmedabad (AHM)
Effect of meteorological parameters along with AOD values in the study regions
Previous studies have noted that meteorological factors, such as wind speed, temperature, and relative humidity, has a strong impact on AOD 33,34. Figure 8 shows the meteorological parameters of temperature (°C), and relative humidity (%) obtained from NASA’S MERRA-II platform at 2 m from sea level along with AOD for the 12 years (2010-2021). Lower AOD values were observed in Jaipur, Ahmedabad, and Mumbai by increasing temperature. Figure 8 reveals the inverse relationship between these parameters for Jaipur, Ahmedabad, and Mumbai during the 12 years (2010-2021).

Figure 8: Impact of meteorological parameters along AOD in Jaipur, Ahmedabad, Surat, Mumbai, and Kolkata during 2010-2021
Overall, based on the results, Kolkata’s highest value was seen (0.8) during 2021, and the lowest value was ~0.2 for most of the years. There were relatively moderate variations in Mumbai, Ahmedabad, and Surat throughout the study period.
As shown in Figure 8, Ahmedabad and Jaipur are semi-arid regions; therefore, they showed lower humidity levels of 53% and 47% during 2020 and 2021, respectively. Due to the fact that Kolkata, Mumbai, and Surat are coastal areas, higher relative humidity levels of 74%, 70%, and 67% were observed, respectively.

Discussion
The major findings of the study are as follows:
  • Significant changes were observed during the study period over the Indian cities from the previous year to the recent year. The Eastern region of Kolkata showed higher AOD concentration compared to the western areas, including Mumbai, Ahmedabad, Surat, and Jaipur. This is due to the fact that IGB has high industrial development and population growth, and Himalaya Mountains’ presence is the main factor in increasing the level of AOD in the region.
  • The seasonal variation shows the maximum AOD during winter and monsoon (0.1 to 1.2), while during pre-monsoon and post-monsoon lower values were observed. Kolkata shows the maximum AOD (0.8) during winter and monsoon. Low to moderate AOD values were observed in Mumbai, Ahmedabad, Surat, and Jaipur. Kolkata showed higher AOD values for all the seasons compared to other regions.
  • In contrast, Jaipur, Ahmedabad, Surat, and Mumbai reported lower mean AOD values with STD than Kolkata, which were (0.23 ± 0.11), (0.45 ± 0.14), (0.44 ± 0.13), (0.41 ± 0.09), and (0.70 ± 0.09), respectively.
  • Regarding meteorological parameters along with AOD, higher temperatures with lower AOD values were found except in Kolkata and Surat. However, the relative humidity level was lower compared to other regions. A reverse trend was observed for Jaipur, Ahmedabad, and Mumbai, with lower AOD and higher temperature and relative humidity, except for Ahmedabad, which reported lower relative humidity.
Conclusion
The selected Indian regions are of great interest for AOD studies, due to their topography and industrial growth, as well as highly growing cities in India. This study examined AOD spatial and temporal distribution over five major Indian cities. The study primarily observed annual, seasonal and monthly distribution, and the monthly mean AOD value was obtained at 550 nm from January 2010 to December 2021 from the MODIS instrument on the Terra satellite.
Acknowledgment
The authors are thankful to the MODIS
team and NASA (https://giovanni.gsfc.nasa.gov/ giovanni/) for providing satellite data and to NASA Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center MERRA-II (https:// www.soda- pro.com/ web-services/meteo-data/ merra) for providing meteorological data.

Funding
None
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

This is an Open-Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon this work for commercial use.

Reference
1.    Ramanathan V, Crutzen PJ, Kiehl JT, et al. Aerosols, Climate, and the Hydrological Cycle. Science. 2001;294(5549):2119–24.
2.    Simpson R, Williams G, Petroeschevsky A, et al. The short-term effects of air pollution on daily mortality in four Australian cities. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2005;29(3):205–12.
3.    Ostro B, Broadwin R, Green S, et al. Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in nine California counties: results from CALFINE. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114(1):29–33.
4.    Analitis A, Katsouyanni K, Dimakopoulou K, et al. Short-term effects of ambient particles on cardiovascular and respiratory mortality. Epidemiology. 2006;17(2):230–3.
5.    Kaufman YJ, Tanré D, Boucher O. A satellite view of aerosols in the climate system. Nature. 2002;419(6903):215–23.
6.    Keitzl T. Turbulent enhancement of the melt-rate at an ice-ocean interface [Internet]. Universität Hamburg Hamburg; 2015. Available from: https://pure.mpg.de/pubman/ faces/ViewItem OverviewPage.jsp?itemId=item_2239535. [Cited Jul 6, 2022].
7.    Mellado JP, van Heerwaarden CC, Garcia JR. Near-Surface effects of free atmosphere stratification in free convection. Boundary Layer Meteorol. 2016;159(1):69–95.
8.    Paasonen P, Asmi A, Petäjä T, et al. Warming-induced increase in aerosol number concentration likely to moderate climate change. Nat Geosci. 2013;6(6):438–42.
9.    Mahowald N. Aerosol Indirect Effect on Biogeochemical Cycles and Climate. Science. 2011;334(6057):794–6.
10.  Seinfeld JH, Seinfeld PD, Pandis SN. Atmospheric Chemistry and physics: from air pollution to climate change. 3rd Edition. Wiley; 2006.
11.  Mhawish A, Banerjee T, Broday DM, et al. Evaluation of MODIS Collection 6 aerosol retrieval algorithms over Indo-Gangetic Plain: Implications of aerosols types and mass loading. Remote Sens Environ. 2017;201:297–313.
12.  Guleria RP, Kuniyal JC, Rawat PS, et al. Validation of MODIS retrieval aerosol optical depth and an investigation of aerosol transport over Mohal in north western Indian Himalaya. Int J Remote Sens. 2012;33(17):5379–401.
13.  Pachauri RK, Reisinger A. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland; 2007. 104 p.
14.  Che H, Gui K, Xia X, et al. Large contribution of meteorological factors to inter-decadal changes in regional aerosol optical depth. Atmos Chem Phys. 2019;19(16):10497–523.
15.  Payra S, Soni M, Kumar A, et al. Intercomparison of aerosol optical thickness derived from MODIS and in situ ground datasets over Jaipur, a semi-arid zone in India. Environ Sci Technol. 2015;49(15):9237–46.
16.  Kedia S, Ramachandran S. Seasonal variations in aerosol characteristics over an urban location and a remote site in western India. Atmos Environ. 2011;45(12):2120–8.
17.  Verma S, Payra S, Gautam R, et al. Dust events and their influence on aerosol optical properties over Jaipur in Northwestern India. Environ Monit Assess. 2013;185(9):7327–42.
18.  Soni M, Payra S, Sinha P, et al. A performance evaluation of WRF model using different physical parameterization scheme during winter season over a semi-arid region, India. Int J Earth Atmos Sci. 2014;1(3):104–14.
19.  King MD, Menzel WP, Kaufman YJ, et al. Cloud and aerosol properties, precipitable water, and profiles of temperature and water vapor from MODIS. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2003;41(2):442–58.
20.  Levy RC, Mattoo S, Munchak LA, et al. The collection 6 MODIS aerosol products over land and ocean. Atmos Meas Tech. 2013;6(11):2989–3034.
21.  Levy RC, Remer LA, Dubovik O. Global aerosol optical properties and application to Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer aerosol retrieval over land. J Geophys Res Atmos. 2007;112(13):2006-15.
22.  Remer LA, Kleidman RG, Levy RC, et al. Global aerosol climatology from the MODIS satellite sensors. J Geophys Res Atmos. 2008;113(D14):D14S07.
23.  Remer LA, Kaufman YJ, Tanré D, et al. The MODIS aerosol algorithm, products, and validation. J Atmos Sci. 2005;62(4):947–73.
24.  Levy RC, Mattoo S, Munchak LA, et al. The collection 6 MODIS aerosol products over land and ocean. Atmos Meas Tech. 2013;6(11):2989–3034.
25.  Kosmopoulos PG, Kaskaoutis DG, Nastos PT, et al. Seasonal variation of columnar aerosol optical properties over Athens, Greece, based on MODIS data. Remote Sens Environ. 2008;112(5):2354–66.
26.  Levy RC, Remer LA, Kleidman RG, et al. Global evaluation of the Collection 5 MODIS dark-target aerosol products over land. Atmos Chem Phys. 2010;10(21):10399–420.
27.  Sayer AM, Thomas GE, Palmer PI, et al. Some implications of sampling choices on comparisons between satellite and model aerosol optical depth fields. Atmos Chem Phys. 2010;10(22):10705–16.
28.  Lee HJ, Coull BA, Bell ML, et al. Use of satellite-based aerosol optical depth and spatial clustering to predict ambient PM2.5 concentrations. Environ Res. 2012;118:8–15.
29.  Gautam R, Hsu NC, Lau KM, et al. Enhanced pre-monsoon warming over the Himalayan-Gangetic region from 1979 to 2007: enhanced Himalayan warming. Geophys Res Lett. 2009;36(7):L07704.
30.  Sharma AR, Kharol SK, Badarinath KVS, et al. Impact of agriculture crop residue burning on atmospheric aerosol loading–a study over Punjab State, India. Ann Geophys. 2010;28(2):367–79.
31.  Tiwari S, Singh AK. Variability of aerosol parameters derived from ground and satellite measurements over Varanasi located in the Indo-Gangetic Basin. Aerosol Air Qual Res. 2013;13(2):627–38.
32.  Sogacheva L, Kolmonen P, Virtanen TH, et al. Post-processing to remove residual clouds from aerosol optical depth retrieved using the advanced along track scanning radiometer. Atmos Meas Tech. 2017;10(2):491–505.
33.  Hoppel WA, Frick GM, Fitzgerald JW, et al. Marine boundary layer measurements of new particle formation and the effects nonprecipitating clouds have on aerosol size distribution. J Geophys Res. 1994;99(7):14443.
34.       Eck TF, Holben BN, Reid JS, et al. Fog-and cloud-induced aerosol modification observed by the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET): Cloud-Induced Aerosol Modification. J Geophys Res Atmos. 2012;117(D7):1-18.

 
Type of Study: Original articles | Subject: Environmental pollution
Received: 2022/08/13 | Accepted: 2022/10/20 | Published: 2022/12/25

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2015 All Rights Reserved | Journal of Environmental Health and Sustainable Development

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb